The Irish Times view on Ukraine: progress on ending the war remains elusive

Detailed summary

Vladimir Medinsky, Moscow’s lead negotiator, says that “every square foot of land will be returned to Russia one way or another”. Its demands include Ukrainian withdrawal from the…

The agreement in last week’s Abu Dhabi talks between Ukraine and Russia on a 1,000-strong prisoner swap – not the first – was the only concrete move that materialised from the disappointing first face-to-face meeting in nine months. It nonetheless has set off a flurry of speculation about what happens next.

US support for European involvement was a welcome shift. It acknowledges that Washington cannot cut deals with Russia on lifting sanctions, returning frozen assets, reducing arms supplies to Kyiv, or reconfiguring European security structures without the active engagement of Europeans. It is worth noting that until recently the US was quite content to negotiate directly with Russia, without even a Ukrainian presence.

Vladimir Medinsky, Moscow’s lead negotiator, says that “every square foot of land will be returned to Russia one way or another”. Its demands include Ukrainian withdrawal from the part of the Donbas region it controls, as well as two other regions partially occupied by Russia.

Medinsky said Russia would only speak to European countries “when their conscience awakens” and they stopped supplying Ukraine with weapons. Zelenskiy said US negotiators had floated the idea of a deal under which Ukraine would give up the Donbas in return for it joining Nato.

EU leaders devoted significant time at their Dublin summit to resolving a dispute on who should speak for Europe at talks with Russia. In the end they agreed that the so-called E5, members of the “coalition of the willing” that backs Ukraine – Germany, France, the UK, Italy and Poland, at national security adviser level – plus the European institutions will represent Europe at any future peace talks.

Smaller member-states had argued that Portuguese president of the European Council, Antonio Costa, should take on the job rather than a collection of larger states. The compromise reflects the union’s inability to move beyond intergovernmentalism, particularly in foreign affairs.

Whether substantive talks…

Opening of the article, excerpted from The Irish Times. To read the rest, open the article on the publisher's site.