Judges close part of ICC Afghanistan investigations that could look at US troops

Detailed summary

The decision by the chamber formally closes not only the line of inquiry into alleged crimes by US troops, but also a probe into the ISIS Khorasan militia. Read more at straitstimes.com.

US Army soldiers patrol in a village in Afghanistan’s southern Kandahar province on June 22, 2011.

THE HAGUE - Judges at the International Criminal Court have issued a decision to formally close part of the prosecutor’s investigations into Afghanistan that previously looked at alleged crimes by US troops and to focus only on actions of the Taliban since 2021, court documents show.

The decision by the chamber formally closes not only the line of inquiry into alleged crimes by US troops, which had already lain dormant since 2021, but also a probe into the Islamic State Khorasan (ISIS-K) militia.

The office of the prosecutor told Reuters on Nov 13 it had appealed the decision but could not give further details.

It is the latest step in a legal tussle between prosecutors and judges about the Afghanistan case, and comes after the United States issued institutional sanctions against the court, citing US opposition to arrest warrants issued for Israeli officials and the investigation into actions of US soldiers in Afghanistan.

In 2026, judges ordered prosecutors to split their Afghanistan inquiries into two separate probes — one focusing on the alleged crimes committed by the Taliban since 2021, and the other on the original Afghanistan inquiry, which also looked at alleged war crimes by US troops but has shifted towards looking at the ISIS-K militia.

Judges said they had taken the decision to close part of the case because prosecutors had not shown they would be able to effectively investigate allegations in Afghanistan apart from the Taliban probe. The splitting of the cases means the arrest warrants issued against four Afghan Taliban leaders remain in effect.

It is unclear if formally closing part of the Afghanistan case will be enough to allay American fears over the court exerting jurisdiction over US nationals as it does not change the court’s founding statute.

Opening of the article, excerpted from The Straits Times. To read the rest, open the article on the publisher's site.