At the Supreme Court, Trump aims to cut the power of judges again

Résumé détaillé

Since returning to office in January 2025, Trump and his allies have castigated judges who have impeded his policies.

Since returning to office in January 2025, Trump and his allies have castigated judges who have impeded his policies.

WASHINGTON – When US President Donald Trump’s administration convinced the US Supreme Court in 2025 to restrict the ability of federal judges to block his actions nationwide – a major boost to his power – the ruling left untouched a separate tool that some of them have used to stymie presidential policies.

Now, Trump is taking aim at that tool as well in another challenge to judicial authority that could further insulate his far-reaching agenda against broad legal attacks.

An appeal filed by Trump’s Justice Department now pending before the Supreme Court urges the justices to curtail the longstanding ability of judges to halt the actions of federal agencies that hold immense power to carry out the Republican president’s policy priorities.

According to the administration, courts should not be able to shut down an agency’s regulation entirely, instead limiting any relief granted only to the specific plaintiffs in a given case.

Aditya Bamzai, a University of Virginia expert in administrative law, said a win for Trump in the case could let the US government continue to enforce rules broadly on all but the plaintiffs in a given case, potentially for years as litigation plays out, even after judges have deemed them unlawful.

Siding with Trump “would give more flexibility to the executive branch”, Bamzai said.

“Whether you like or dislike that flexibility can perhaps depend on whether you like or dislike a particular administration’s policies,” Bamzai added.

Since returning to office in January 2025, Trump and his allies have castigated judges who have impeded his policies – deriding some as radical or corrupt – even as he tests the limits of presidential powers.

Début de l'article, extrait de The Straits Times. Pour lire la suite, ouvrez l'article chez le média.